Blog

step one. Yet, inside the genealogy, we all knowthat for every single code there is a difference. A good vexing area ofgenealogy is the fact not one person extremely understands how to apply the fresh exceptions orrules with one decisive adjective instance usually, perhaps, probably,more than likely, etcetera. It would be fascinating in the event that there almost every other advice ofjointures becoming made per year or several after a known relationships day.

dos. Can there be an extant dispensation to your relationships out-of ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, shortly after taken from this new fifth LordClifford? That would restrict the marriage date.

Arthur

Allegedly, if the a good dispensation is actually sought for and you will granted, it might havebeen by the among the after the, that can can be found in the brand new correspondingregister guide, in the event it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop https://kissbrides.com/hr/kanadske-nevjeste/ off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford really does marry in early 1487 [state January] andhas E later where year, do the newest chronology perhaps not work?

John possession?

Age produced within the later 1487, Henry created during the 1488/9, Joan during the ,an such like. filling in brand new names of post away from . When the (a) thechronology however really works; and you can (b) their particular matrimony bit wasn’t reasonable; thenwe have only the brand new 1505 pedigree regarding Henry VII’s which is in the oppositionto brand new supposition one to she is actually a valid daughter.

six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Have there been anybody else? If so,wouldn’t one reflect defectively with this document because a source?

Away from comparisons We have made of this new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s North pedigrees, which can be

Regarding the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the brand new Clifford children are maybe not listedin good Clifford pedigree, but instead regarding the St. John pedigree. As I’mnot always the brand new St. John family unit members, adopting the is the pointers asit seems regarding c.1505 pedigree, as extracted from the 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. article. The latest phrasing inside quotations is exactly because it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Of my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset had three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Woman the new King’s Mommy.” who had “This new Queen.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

An effective. “Edith, married so you can Geoffrey Rod regarding Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married on the Woman Margaret, dau. out of theDuke away from Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a unique child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five youngsters:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A great Nun out of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you will sistren.” Having issueindicated, yet not entitled.C2. “Age, wedded to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, wedded basic for the Lord Zouche; immediately after to your LordScrope out-of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated although not entitled.

Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, by the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Elizabeth.”